1, when Borland thing of the past
Borland said the Lao side even Zhanzhao seat category, but for a long time no talk Borland, think also. However, Borland now what to talk about it?
Yesterday saw high on fat, the latest on the Borland IDE - DeXter a DemoVideo, Linghu 8, an article on Borland's stuff. For Borland the company, our view is similar.
Borland has changed. Is no longer before the high-spirited wanderers knight, but a brain large intestine where fat Fugu; his own, not those filled with Aura's development tools, but the coins are covered with taste of enterprise solutions.
Borland, not that I had known that Borland had.
But as a commercial company, profit is more important than the technical ideal. When the development tool to bring more profit is low, under pressure from shareholders, we need a new profit growth point Caixing.
Before 2078, Borland development tools, the first attempt from the field of enterprise applications, the company even had a name for this change Inprise. Results Anders left, Borland himself to play almost dead.
Before 2012, Borland began to enterprise solutions, but this time for the software development company comes in without too much deviation. But the result is Black.Stone, Chuck.Jazdzewski and others left.
To the contrary, Borland every brilliant, closely linked with the development tools.
Established 83 years, is relied on Anders's famous for: Turbo Pascal 1.0. After the DOS era, almost all of Borland's development tools world: Turbo Pascal, Turbo C, Turbo C + + ... ...
Windows 3.x era, is Borland's Borland C + + came out to save the majority of developers. Then after that is Delphi.
But these are already past the (Please refer to Levi's own "Borland Legend," a book).
The question is now how out?
Since the. Net came out, Borland on confused. The first is flat Kylix, Borland intends to join the Linux camp, coupled with the leadership of the Group's attempt also failed, had to exit the Linux platform development tools in the field. Then the MS spread news that Win32 should all go. Net under, Borland has rush released for. Net's C # Builder and Delphi 8, the result is defeat. Want to engage in a platform-independent C + + BuilderX, the same or failed.
When the C + + BuilderX out, I wrote a "C + + BuilderX Problems and Prospects", was out front in Delphi 2005, I wrote an article entitled "Legend DELPHI9 - DiamondBack". But now what is there to write it?
This DeXter looks better: still the one called Galileo the IDE, maybe it would be BDS4, or. Net platform to run, than Delphi 2005 adds native support for C + + is basically the equivalent of the C + + Builder 6 integrated into Delphi 2005 years. Nothing more.
Of course, not to say there is no increase in the area, at least in Delphi 2005 as the reconstruction of the increase, unit testing, enhanced debugging capabilities ... ... These are the C + + Builder 6 does not have. Not to mention that in these areas can do in DeXter what extent are still unknown, let alone in those heavyweight in Delphi.net enhancements like ECOII and Together they should be unobtainable. The key is:
A do native C + + application development, and why the need to rely on. Net?
C + + BuilderX with the IDE - PrimeTime - people very uncomfortable reliance on JAVA has had. VS to do large and has its base platform, Borland does not own the platform, the. Net is not VS.net next opponent. Might as well give up the Galileo of the IDE, the Delphi.net, Together, ECOII order for VS.net manner and concentrate to do the right thing. As for the original application, on the road continue to go native, do not keep thinking what to get a native platform, no matter. Net or JAVA.
Borland indiscreet criticisms of the careless again, or go back and do it my ABAP. . Net or JAVA with occasional relationship?
Perhaps many years later, when someone mentioned Borland, I still think about those past events have occurred in it.
BTW: According to Cai Cai replied DeXter is based on the Eclipse of the CDE, if this is the case, it is not bad. But I doubt Borland would be really determined and PrimeTime Galileo abandoned the two IDE, and turned to Eclipse. Borland, after all, not IBM.
2, dedicated to former Borland
Do not remember how long it does not talk about and care about Borland has.姣忓ぉ涔犳儻鎬х殑杈撳叆鈥渂orland.mblogger.cn鈥濈殑鏃跺?锛屽眳鐒朵篃寰堝皯鑱旀兂鍒拌繖涓浘缁忓績鐩腑鏈?簡涓嶈捣鐨勫叕鍙搞?
銆??Turbo C 2.0銆乀urbo Pascal 7.0銆丅orland C++ 3.1锛岃繖浜涙様鏃ョ殑缁忓吀浣滃搧锛屾浘缁忚澶氬皯浜哄簾瀵濆繕椋燂紝浠庢璧颁笂缂栫▼涔嬭矾銆?br />
銆??灏辫繛閭ｄ簺澶辫触鐨勪骇鍝侊紝涔熷彲鍦堝彲鐐广?姣斿Kylix锛岄櫓浜涘氨鏀瑰彉浜哃inux涓嬪簲鐢ㄧ▼搴忕殑寮?彂鏂瑰紡锛涙瘮濡侰++Builder X锛屾彁鍑虹殑寰堝姒傚康璁╀汉鑰崇洰涓?柊銆?br />
銆??寰蒋鐨?NET瀹ｄ紶绐佺劧闂撮摵澶╃洊鍦帮紝鏉ュ娍姹规惫锛屼负鎴戜滑钀ラ?浜嗕竴涓?.NET everywhere鈥濈殑涓栫晫銆傛瘮璧峰叾鍓嶈緢Java鐨勨?write once, run everywhere鈥濇湁杩囦箣鑰屾棤涓嶅強銆傚湪濡傛寮哄ぇ鐨勫浼犳敾鍔夸笅锛屾湁鍑犱釜浜鸿兘澶熶繚鎸佹竻閱掔殑澶磋剳鍛紵
銆??浜庢槸锛孋# Builder鏉ヤ簡锛孌elphi.NET 涔熸潵浜嗐?
銆??浣嗘槸.NET鍜學indows API涓嶄竴鏍枫?Windows API鏄痜lat function鐨勫舰寮忥紝瀵逛簬OOP骞朵笉鍗佸垎鍙嬪ソ锛岀敋鑷虫湁浜涚悊蹇碉紙濡傚洖璋冨嚱鏁帮級杩樻湁鐩稿啿绐佷箣澶勶紝鍥犳锛孷CL灏嗗叾灏佽鎴怬O鐨勫舰寮忥紝鏄崄鍒嗘湁鍒╀簬蹇?寮?彂鐨勶紱鑰?NET浠庝竴璇炵敓璧峰氨鑰冭檻鍒颁簡缁勪欢鍖栧拰鍙鍖栫殑闂锛屽洜姝わ紝浣跨敤VCL灏嗗叾鍐嶆灏佽锛屼笉浠呮病鏈変粈涔堝ソ澶勶紝鍙嶈?璁╀汉浜х敓浜嗕娇鐢ㄤ笂鐨勪笉涔犳儻銆?br />
銆??鍦?NET瀹ｄ紶濡傛棩涓ぉ鐨勬椂鍊欙紝C++ Builder鍧氭寔璧版湰鍦板寲寮?彂鐨勮矾锛屾?绠楁槸Borland鐨勪竴娆℃槑鏅轰妇鍔紝鍚﹀垯锛屽浠婄殑BCB涓?畾浼氬儚managed C++閭ｆ牱娑堝け鐨勬棤褰辨棤韪紙鍥犱负Borland涓嶅彲鑳芥暍鍍忓井杞偅鏍峰ぇ鍒?様鏂х殑鏀瑰姩C++鏈韩锛夈?浣嗘槸锛岄偅涓鍚屾祴璇曠増涓?牱鐨凚CBX瀹炲湪鏄激浜嗗ぇ瀹剁殑蹇冿紝BCB涔熷洜姝ら櫓浜涗粠Borland鐨勫紑鍙戣鍒掍腑娑堝け銆傜湡鏄彲鎮插彲鍙广?
銆??Borland鐨勭綉绔欎篃鏀圭増浜嗭紝閬靛惊浜哫HTML鏍囧噯锛屾澘鍧楀尯鍒嗕篃娓呮櫚浜嗐?浣嗘槸锛屼互鍓嶉暱闀夸竴涓茬殑products鍚嶅崟锛岀幇鍦ㄥ彉鎴愪簡瀵ュ3椤癸細Application LifeCycle銆両DE銆丄pplication Middleware銆?br />
Using De Exterminate Rabbits Annoying Ads RMVB Movies
SWF To WMV
Describe the C # call an EXTERNAL process
YouTube to MPG
Evaluation Nature - Screen Savers
College Student Hidden Hard To Guarantee The Right To Life And Health Worries
WINDOWS 7 hidden gems
CONVERT TS files
VBScript ReDim statement
Infomation Components And Libraries
Prerelease DOWNLOAD ATi Catalyst 5.5
First job out of the ivory tower beginning how THE election